lily_handmaiden: (Default)

icon )

Hi, I'm back! And hopefully doing lots of updates for the next few weeks, because I have so many things to post! Second year of grad school so far is going very well. I have discovered that I love The Waste Land, successfully given a presentation, read Pride and Prejudice for the fifth time (it's still good), my BTW kids don't suck as much as last year (it would be hard to), and my 209 kids are excellent. I'm teaching them Sir Gawain and the Green Knight right now, which could not be better for me. I come out of class every Friday feeling wonderful about everything and everyone except my new BTW Snowflake.

I've sort of taken up "Chess" as the soundtrack to SGGK lesson planning, because it works in weird ways. "Everybody's playing the [beheading] game, but nobody's rules are the same..."

Oh! Also, I've posted recaps of the first five episodes of The Clone Wars and a recap of Bones season 1 episode 17, "The Skull in the Desert" on [livejournal.com profile] storydice. The Clone Wars recaps have been sitting on my computer forever, and now I'm scrambling to post them all before the second season premiere, so the plan is to post one of those a day until I run out of recaps or run out of days.

I am horrible about starting projects and not finishing them, but I am determined to finish reviewing all of the Merlin episodes, so here are my thoughts on the episode "Excalibur."

 

WILL NOBODY HAVE SEX ON THIS SHOW FOR MY ENTERTAINMENT? )
lily_handmaiden: (Default)

icon )

13-year-old Erin and I are back for the second installment of Project Twilight.

 

 

He is a vampire and oh so dangerous, whee! )

 

13-year-old Erin and I will see you next time for chapters 11-15.

IN THE MEANTIME. Today I discovered that Lucy Scherer, a.k.a. The Original German Glinda of whom I have become a great fan via my Wicked translation project, was previously in the cast of Tanz der Vampire, a German musical about vampires. Which prominently features as its love ballad a German version of the song, "Total Eclipse of the Heart." I went directly to YouTube, and spent a good deal of time watching clips with this face: / : 0. And laughing hysterically. If you were wondering how "Total Eclipse of the Heart" could become even more ridiculous and awesome...

Hilarious video and links! )
lily_handmaiden: (Default)

It's been a while since I've posted the icons I've made, and I figure I might as well do it now before February sweeps hits. Therefore, behold!

Bones

1.   2.   3.   4.

The Office

1.   2.   3.

4 more )

How I Met Your Mother

1.

Kate Beaton Comics

1.   2.   3.

6 more, featuring George IV, Shakespeare, and Fat Napoleon )

Jonathan Coulton

1.   2.   3.

7 more Skullcrusher Mountain )
Austen vs. Bronte

1.   2.   3.

Ah, the age-old question: If Jane Austen and Charlotte Bronte got into a knock-down drag-out fight, who would win? My money's on Jane. (These are for Whitney. :))

The Duchess

1.   2.   3.   4.

12 more )
And, because the movie was so pretty that the icons don't really need text, I give you my "Duchess" bases.

bases )
lily_handmaiden: (Default)
As we've already established, it's season finale time, and that means it's also time for me to burn off my nervous finale-related energy by making icons. Which means that it's also time for me to get rid of the backlog of icons I've developed over the past few months. And thus this post came to be.

10 Austen-related icons
Three quotes from Austenblog's comparison of Mansfield Park '07's Fanny Price to Chuck Norris. Seven book illustrations.

1.  2.


12 Bones icons
Let us remember happy times, before the season finale tomorrow potentially makes everything much less happy.

1.  2.  3.  4.  


6 Susan Pevensie icons

1.  2.  3.


7 for "Story Dice"
Have I mentioned yet that Michael and I have started a recapping blog? Amazingly enough, I haven't! Everybody, go visit [profile] storydice! I am recapping Bones so far, and Michael is recapping How I Met Your Mother and Psych.

1.  2.  3.  4.


2 Misc
One for "How I Met Your Mother," and one of Marie de France.
 

lily_handmaiden: (Default)
Here is what I've been doing with my life lately, which has made regular posting kind of impossible.

In case y'all haven't heard, THE WRITERS' STRIKE IS OVER! WHOOOO! 

Everything has, from what I understand, been resolved very satisfactorily for the writers. They're getting most of what they asked for, and they went back to work this past Wednesday. Which means shows will soon be back in production! I know for certain that The Office is getting 5-6 new episodes in April and May, as will many other shows we all know and love and miss. I'm so psyched; I had fully prepared myself for the strike to drag on through June.

As Stephen Colbert announced at the opening of his show on Wednesday, "Our writers are back, and they are sexy."

I am now going to replace the word "down" on the "Pencils Down Means Pencils Down" sign on my wall with "Up."

In celebration of the end of the strike-- okay, mostly in celebration of me finally having enough time-- I'm going to actually catch up on my Fifty Book Challenge entries, and then this journal can get back to regular, fun content. Which pleases me. Several times in the past few days I've wanted to do an entry about something and haven't because I have to catch up on this damn Fifty Book Challenge. So here we go!

 



lily_handmaiden: (Default)
icon )
 
Before I get on to the main subject of this entry, I just want to draw everyone's attention to the fact that Ben Silverman, president of NBC, actually said this. Just when I thought I couldn't get anymore pissed off about the Writers' Strike, they go and attack nerddom. Big mistake, as the TWOP blog points out. I think every writer in the world should make an appointment to personally bitchslap Silverman. And remind him that, no, the nerds weren't the mean ones; the mean kids are the ones who steal the nerds' lunch money. Also, I will not be watching the fake Golden Globes. My reaction to finding out they were canceled was this: "HAHAHAHAHAHA!" and my only regret is that I will not get to see the lovely and talented Ruth Wilson attend them. This year. I'm sure it'll happen someday.

Now, on to a somewhat belated quotes of the semester. This entry is dedicated to Whitney, who made me remember to do them. And for letting me steal from her QuoteBook.

To start off here, is the funniest thing that was said in my Mark Twain class:

"Is this the funniest thing you've read by Twain? Probably not, depending on your views on cannibalism." - Dr. Jobe



lily_handmaiden: (Default)
icon )

The semester is finally over, all of my grad school applications have been sent, I am DONE! WHOOO! I missed you, my beloved livejournal.

Sunday was Jane Austen's 232nd birthday! Happy Birthday, Jane!

In her honor, I am going to catch up on those 50 Book Challenge entries!






lily_handmaiden: (Default)
icon )

Ladies and gentlemen, hear ye all: I AM ON AUSTENBLOG!

I am a "Guest Poster!" The Editrix of the blog sent me a very nice and complimentary email! I rock!

Cheer From Chawton, a one-woman show by Karen Eterovich about the life and work of Jane Austen, came to Hanover a couple of weeks ago. It was incredible. We were incredibly lucky to get the show here; Karen Eterovich is a friend of one of our directors, Jim. I loved the show incredibly, and I even got to sort of live the dream in that I got to portray Fanny Knight, Jane Austen's niece (whom she loved dearly), and give cue lines. It's probably the closest I'll get to acting in a Jane Austen play, aside from maybe a P&P scene in my 18th century novel class. It was amaaaaazing. And I got to meet Karen Eterovich, and I cannot stress enough how nice she was. I was fangirling hardcore, I swear. Even though I'd never seen her show, I'd heard about it via the internets, and it sounded so cool, and she'd toured all over the US and Britian and performed at the Jane Austen Festival in Bath and everything, so she's sort of Austenland famous. Karen Eterovich was gracious and talked to me about England and didn't disparage me for going to Groovy European Pizza Hut (which story just sort of poured out of my mouth, I don't know what happened), and we talked Jane Austen, and I asked her about her research and her costume and the Festival (though not as much as I would have liked to, but I didn't want to bother her too much) and apologized for being such a dork, but she assured me it was cool. 

The show was, as I think I've said, wonderful. I would have posted about it in detail here, except that I decided to send it to Austenblog instead. And my whole entire review got printed there! EEEEEEEEEEE!
Remember when I was sqeeing about getting my timeline on Bronteana? Well, this is kind of an even bigger deal. Austenblog is the place for Jane Austen news, and one of the top two Austen sites on the internet. And Karen Eterovich told he she was scared of it. I hope she is not any longer. :)

Here is my original squeeful post on Compendium about it. To which I can really only add that for a while my review was the number two result on Google if you typed in "Cheer From Chawton," preceded only by the official site. I am currently third. Thanks to ABFG for the heads up on that! 

And, in case Austenblog is ever decimated by an internet plague, or something, I am going to repost my review here in its entirety, under a cut. Every word is true, by the way. It was such a cool, enlightening-in-a-dorky-way experience.

lily_handmaiden: (Default)
icon )

I'd like to start off by celebrating the triumphant return of my computer, Yané, to functionality. On Friday I was about a half hour into the second episode of North and South when my computer went crazy. I got a whole ton of virus alerts, then my antivirus program started "scanning my messages," whatever that means, taking up the whole screen at times with little popups about message scanning, and every now and then informing me that it couldn't send something because it was spam. And I was like, "I'm not even doing anything!" After a while of this I unplugged my internet connection and finished the N&S episode, but every two minutes or so a virus threat alert would pop up. The alert would say it had deleted the problem, but clearly it was lying because the popups wouldn't stop. My dad and I tried everything we knew how to do to fix it, but nothing worked. The weekend passed. On Monday we finally called a repair company, and on Tuesday Bryan Knauer from PC Pro Technologies came and fixed everything, and even reset my computer clock so it actually tells the right time, in a little over an hour. So if you live in the Indianapolis area and your computer gone done broke, call this guy. He was really nice and polite and he saved my computer.

Now I will talk about Thursday Next: First Among Sequels. I wasn't going to halt reading Les Mis before I was done with it, but hearing that this book had been released changed my mind. I am now back to Les Mis, on page 1206 with about 260 pages to go, but here is my review of TN: FAS. I have whited out major spoilers, things you don't discover in the first thirty pages anyway.


Speaking of the latest Austen surge, this article is a very good one. I may have become a hardcore Janeite only recently, but I think that's mostly because I've just reached an age where I can relate to it. It's not becaue of the surge. I tend to be very accepting of the different adaptations, though, as long as they get people interested. I mean, you saw what I said about Becoming Jane, as ashamed as I kind of am about it. 

I especially relate to the part of the article where the colleage tells the author that he just can't seem to get through Pride and Prejudice. I've been there, and I, too, have been thinking, "Okay... why are you telling me this?" I'm not sure how I am expected to respond, but here are some of the possible responses I think are expected:

1) Okay, you caught me! I've been hiding the Ultimate Secret to Enjoying Jane Austen and keeping it all for myself! Mwhahahaha! I will share it with you if you give me five dollars!
2) You're right, the book sucks. I've actually never finished it, either. I just pretend I have because it makes me look smart. Really, it's impossible to read.
3) It's all right, my child. I absolve you.
4) Do you want to fight? Are you trying to make me cry? I won't cry, but I will by God make you bleed if you insult Jane Austen again!

None of these are true. I usually just smile and mutter things like, "Oh, that's okay... I understand... Yeah, it can be hard... Well, you're a boy..." The truth is, if you can't get through Pride and Prejudice, it's nobody's fault but yours. Yes, the language takes a little getting used to if most of what you read is modern stuff. But once you get accustomed to it, there is really no excuse. It's a good book. It has humor and heart and it's not just for girls, either. Just like Star Wars isn't only for boys. If you can't get through it, I don't know why. Don't look at me like you expect me to tell you.

Note that this doesn't necessarily apply to all of Austen. Mansfield Park is not to everyone's taste, and I realize that; it's kind of dark, and not everyone finds the protagonists likeable. That's a legitimate argument. I tell people not to try MP unless they're really serious aout Austen. Sense and Sensibility is Jane Austen's first work, and as such it is a little less tight in narrative and characterization, etc. It's a harder read. Emma, Northanger Abbey, and Persuasion are easier. But Pride and Prejudice is Jane Austen's "light, bright, and sparkling" work, and besides, I'm betting you liked the movie. I can respect reading it and not really liking it for some reason, I suppose, but attempting to read it and failing? So I guess what bothers me is the "I can't get through it and I don't know why" statement.

I tend to take what I have come to think of as the Elvis approach to things like this. There is an excellent Dave Barry article about Elivs fas that I have quoted at length before it relation to the way I feel about my fandoms. There is one fan who says that she used to try to defend Elvis,  but then she realized that he didn't need defending. In Barry's words, "If you don't hear what they hear, feel what they feel, that's your misfortune." And that's how I tend to look at this problem: You can't get through Pride and Prjejudice? Too bad for you. You're missing out. Don't apologize, you're not insulting me by not finishing Pride and Prejudice; you're only insulting your own intelligence.

(I really hope that nobody who reads this journal feels insulted by this. I do realize that the language takes time to get used to, and that can make reading difficult for a while. And I appreciate that you have to have a certain affinity for the genre to tackle the harder books. For example, Whitney, I do not think that you are intolerably stupid. Or, in fact, stupid at all. I hope that I have made that very, very clear. And Jenaba, I don't know how you're doing with P&P, but I don't think you're intolerably stupid, either. And Jonah, if you happen to read this, I truthfully think that maybe you're not giving yourself a fair chance.)

lily_handmaiden: (Default)


So, I saw Becoming Jane on Saturday. And I really liked it.

I think, had I known nothing whatsoever about Jane Austen going in, I would probably have enjoyed it for itself, as it was. There were some really lovely performances. Anne Hathaway was okay. Her voice annoyed me a little at times (maybe she's a little more nasal than the Jane Austen in my head, I don't know; finally I just said to myself, 'Look, you don't know Jane Austen didn't sound like that, so just deal), but not so much toward the end. The movie had a few good laughs but, especially for the kind of movie it was with the subject it had, could have used a lot more. Like people keep saying, it would all be well and good if it was trying to be like Shakespeare in Love, or even remotely light-hearted throughout, but it's not. 

Since I do know quite a bit about Jane Austen, I enjoyed the movie partly for the good parts that were there-- and there were some-- and partly because it was so much fun to make fun of. When it's out on DVD, Whitney and I are going to write a parody. We were probably really annoying in the theater again; we couldn't shut up. Here are some highlights:

 


Wow, that cut title messed up, and I don't know how to fix it. Oh, well.

There were a couple of parts that I think captured something of Jane Austen: when she was writing to Cassandra about Tom and stopped and said, "too many adjectives," and when the letter got to her sister, it was practically cut to ribbons; when she kissed Tom (not the aftermath of it, but her initiation of the kiss I quite liked); yes, okay, her cricket playing, much as I realize what a contrived Device that was; her refusal of Mr. Wisley's proposal; "If his heart does not stop at the sight of you, then he does not deserve to live. And yes, I am aware of the contradiction embodied in that sentence."; the part where she snuggles up to Cassandra after Mr. Fowle dies. 

There were also parts that were very un-Austenlike. This portrayal had her as generally much more inconsiderate of others than I could believe she was. When she was about to elope (I'm wincing as I'm typing this, it's so Made Up) with Tom Lefroy, she says to her sister, something like, "If you could have [your dead fiancee] 'Robert' back and this was the only way to be together, would you do it?" and that is such a low blow. It's like emotionally punching Cassandra in the face. And I typed "Robert" because his real name was Tom, but they didn't want to have two Toms in the film, so "his name shall be Robert, if you please." Really, I think that Jane should have gone for Mr. Wisley; he was the most Darcy-like of anyone. Except oh! That's right! He's fictional! Strangely, there was a real John Warren who was once a student of Mr. Austen and a friend of the family, but Mr. Wisley and Lady Gresham are completely Made Up. He at least, seems to be partly based on Harris Bigg-Wither, to whom Jane was engaged for a day ca. 1800. But, of course, he didn't have a Lady Catherine-like aunt. And neither did any of the sons of the actual local rich family of Steventon, so the two of them had to come as a Made-Up package deal. Because of course Jane Austen couldn't have come up with Lady Catherine de Bourgh on her own *eyeroll*. And then, after Tom's return, we are no longer watching anything like Jane Austen, but rather someone who is quite a bit like Marianne Dashwood. There was quite a bit about what the movie was saying about writing that went against everything Jane Austen stood for in her writing. That jarred a little.

Anna Maxwell Martin did a lovely job as Cassandra. James Cromwell stole all of his scenes as Mr. Austen-- I swear, the expression on his face when he overhears his wife essentially saying she wishes she hadn't married him could break your heart, and so could his reaction when he gets the letter saying that Tom "Robert" Fowle has died. Lucy Lefroy, at least, seems to live up to Jane Austen's actual opinion of her: that she was really silly. Although she should have been wearing her hair up. I also really liked how they used George, Jane's brother who was probably deaf. It was nice to see him and his place in the family, and I really wanted to give him big hugs. Why the other brothers, except for Henry, were not included, I don't know. They mentioned Edward, so that's fine; Frank and Charles could have been at sea; but what about James? James lived right there, he should have been included. I also didn't like that it made it seem like Henry married Eliza because of her money, since he'd had a crush on her since he was about thirteen. If "irony" is the combination of untruths to make a new truth, does that make this movie very ironic?

We laughed louder than about anybody in the theater. There was some real rollicking fun. This could be because we got all the references. ("OMG The Mysteries of Udolpho!") I liked all the little bits about irony. I think those were pretty true to Jane as well.

So, in conclusion, do I want to own this movie and see it again? Yes, I do.

And, as much as I do not approve of fandom activity surrounding this movie-- fanfics, etc., the first person who makes a Becoming Jane fanvideo to the song "Ironic" is made of win.

Here, have an extra icon.

lily_handmaiden: (Default)
icon )

I'll begin by saying that I have seen Order of the Phoenix, and I liked it very much. I do wish they'd included the scene where Hagrid gets fired-- like PoA, I get the distinct feeling that they do not connect the dots quite well enough for anyone who has not read the book to really pick up on what's going on, and their kids will have to explain it all to them on the car ride home. But I loved the girl who played Luna-- her voice annoyed me a little at first, but not by the end-- Imelda Staunton, and Crazy Helena Bonham Carter. My favorite moment of the whole movie was probably when Bellatrix has just killed Sirius, and for a moment she has this look like, "Whoa... I just killed my cousin." and then that quickly transforms into, "Hee hee! I just killed my cousin! Hahahahaha!" So cool. I will be on the road on the way to vacation in North Carolina when the book comes out, but I have been assured that we can stop someplance Saturday morning and pick it up. Does anyone think this will be a problem, just out of curiosity? Like, will places be carrying it for certain or will they be sold out after the crazy midnight hype?

Well, aside from that, I've finished my first book in my fifty book challenge: Jane Austen's Letters, edited by Deirdre LeFaye.

lily_handmaiden: (Default)
icon )

This is the concluding chapter of my account of my trip to England.

For my last stop, I went to the city of Bath with Whitney, Tiffany, and Jenaba ([profile] celtic_songster). We took the train from Stratford, which was... adventurous. Let's just say, it's not easy getting four people and all of their luggage through three train stops to a final destination. And then once we got to that destination, we lugged our luggage all the way across central Bath, lost a good deal of the way. At one point I had to stop and exclaim to the heavens, "WHY ARE THERE NO F***ING STREET SIGNS IN THIS F***ING COUNTRY?" But we did at last figure out where we were, and shortly after that figured out how to get to our B&B. 

After we had stowed our luggage and laid on our beds drenched in sweat for a while, burning off the exhaustion, we were able to go out and actually appreciate the beaty of the city, and Bath is beautiful. It was about 8:30 or 9 by this time, so we cast about for someplace to stop and eat that was not too smoky and not too expensive and close by. We finally settled on a groovy European Pizza Hut, where we had pizza topped with grilled chicken and goat cheese, had quesadilla apetizers that were stuffed with pepperoni, and had delicious ice cream cake for dessert. It was pretty awesome. As in the old days, the entire population of Bath seemed that night to be entirely made up of old people and teenagers. The teenagers loved hanging out at the Groovy Pizza Hut.

The next day we boarded a double-decker bus and rode on the top in the rain, for which we blame Jenaba. We went to the Jane Austen Centre, which was really cool, at least for me-- they had costumes from the new ITV Persuasion and the '99 Mansfield Park, and they had cool Regency and Georgian Stuff, and they had one of Jane Austen's letters to Cassandra... yeah, I'm a dork. I could have bought that whole gift shop. By the time we came out of the Centre, it had cleared up and turned into a lovely day. We next went to the Roman Baths, which were so cool. It was just unbelievable how long they had been there-- that that place had been sacred since before the Romans came to Britain. If there was a real basis for King Arthur, he probably came there-- the Battle of Badon Hill was probably in the surrounding area. And right next door was Bath Abbey, which was very pretty from the outside-- we didn't go in because we didn't have that much money left and we decided we didn't want to pay. Then we went to the Assembly Rooms and Museum of Costume. The Assembly Room itself-- the Ball Room, anyway, was closed for renovations, but the Octagon Room and the Tea Room were open, and I was in heaven. Because Jane Austen hung out there. Her fictional characters did, too. And it was gorgeous, of course. The Costume Museum was also really cool, and I we got to try on corsets and hoop skirts again-- I found a corset that would make my waist go as small as it could actually go, so that was fun. 

After that we just walked around Bath. We went to the Royal Crescent, and we walked on the Gravel Walk, and down Milsom Street, and Union Street, and the Circus. I will say again, though I can't say enough, that Bath is so beautiful, especially places like the Circus and the Crescent. And these were places I've read about a lot, and matters of fictional import took place on them, so that was just such fun. In the words of Rudyard Kipling in his story "The Janeites," "If you’d been initiated then,” he says, “you’d ha’ felt your flat feet tingle every time you walked over those sacred pavin’-stones."

We also went to Victoria Park, which has one of the coolest playgrounds I've ever seen. The next day we did more walking around and shopping. We rode around on the double-decker bus-- actually we rode around in circles a couple of time because the bus wouldn't stop where we wanted, even though Tiffany kept pressing the button, and we were pretty sure we were going to have to ride it for eternity. Actually, the audio tour on the bus is pretty amusing. From the lady on the recording, we learned about Prince Frederick of Wales, who got dead from tennis ball, and about how the most dangerous place in town is the beginners' golf course, and about how "Jane Austen came to bath in 1801, and has been good for tourism ever since." We laughed really hard right there and nobody else did... oh, well. We got it. We also saw Laura Place and Pulteney Bridge that day, plus lots of great shops.

By the way, I'm pretty sure that our B&B room was haunted, because when I was half-awake the night before we left, I kept hearing the floor creak over and over in the same place like somebody was pacing over it, but we were all in bed. That would also maybe explain why our bathroom kept smelling like smoke. I told Jenaba this in the morning, and she was very glad I had not told her beforehand.

We caught an exceptionally early train out of Bath, dealt with all of the horrible luggage transfers again, and made it to Heathrow before anyone in our group, so HA! Well done us. I would like to take this opportunity to say to my travel companions that I love you guys and thank you for roaming England with me. It was wonderful.

Can I go back now?
lily_handmaiden: (Default)
icon )

Here is my second part of my account of my trip to England.

After we left London we went to Hampton Court Palace, which was where Henry VIII (who LOVES himself) lived with Anne Boleyn. This place was amazing, because most of it is displayed as it would have been at the time, which is beautiful. It was so amazing to think that I was walking through the apartments of generations of kings and queens. And I have found my true calling, because there are re-enactors there, and I so much want that to be my job.

We spent a few hours there, then went on to Stratford-upon-Avon. This town is a gorgeous little place. It's very homey and just a lovely place to stay. I stayed in the Quilts and Croissants Bed and Breakfast, which is run by Richard and Sue, just about the nicest people you could ever hope to meet. It was a lovely place to stay, incredibly comfortable beds, really good food, and wonderful people. Of course we visited Shakespeare's Birthplace, Anne Hathaway's house, and Mary Arden's house during our stay. These places are all uniquely cool, and it's fun to imagine Shakespeare living in there, walking around, doing his Shakespeare thing. We also went on a couple of hikes through the countryside which was SO BEAUTIFUL. Nothing is as beautiful as English countryside. At the end of the hikes, my feet hurt like whoa and my poor shoes were covered in mud (good English mud!), but oh! We saw these little villages all set up in the sort of manor systerm-- one of them was just like I would imagine Highbury, from Emma. And we saw the site (through the mist, no less!) of an iron-age hill fort! I just about squee'd my little head off. My brain was rocketing so fast between Jane Austen love and King Arthur love that even my mind was exhausted when we came back.

We had classes at the Shakespeare Centre. We had lectures and discussions with the foremost Shakespeare experts in the world: Stanley Wells, Paul Edmondson, Robert Smallwood... And Robert Smallwood, let me tell you now, is magical. He's a born storyteller, he loves what he does and wants everyone else to love it too, his eyes twinkle, and his voice just draws you in. We also had a master-class with Jane Lapotaire, a BBC actress, which was both instructive and terrifying. When she demanded lines of Shakespeare, the entire class simultaneously forgot we'd been doing monologues and went, "...". We had discussions with people from the plays we'd seen-- the awesome William Gaunt, who was Gloucester in Lear and Sorin in The Seagull, the Fool from Lear, and the very cool Monica Dolan, who was Regan in Lear and Mascha in The Seagull (and, by the way, was fresh out of the lead in Polly Teale's Jane Eyre).

While we were staying in Stratford, we took day trips to Warwick Castle and Kenilworth Castle, and to Oxford. Warkwick was great, if over-commercialized, because it was my first castle. And the parts of it that hadn't been messed with were terrifically atmospheric. Kenilworth, which is a ruin, but which used to belong to Robert Dudley, is simply gorgeously beautiful. It just feels... so melancholy, almost eerie, when you're there. At Oxford we toured Christ Church, which was also beautiful. I almost can't imagine going to school in someplace so old and beautiful. We saw the dining hall, which is where they shoot Harry Potter's Great Hall. And the cathedral, where they have relics of St. Frideswide. 

Finally, here is a brief summary of the plays we saw. The Seagull was... eh. It was okay. The leads weren't very good. King Lear had Ian McKellan in it (naked, at once point, which... I could have done without seeing), and some very talented actors giving great performances. Cordelia was not good at... anything really, including being dead. The Taming of the Shrew was disturbing. Twelfth Night was surprisingly good, even with an all-male cast. A Midsummer Night's Dream was the most amazing piece of theatre I have ever seen. Check out its website. If you ever, ever get a chance to see it, GO. It makes you believe in all kinds of magic. The best way I can think of to describe it is Shakespeare meets Cirque do Soleil meets Bollywood. The actors peform all kinds of amazing acrobatics (while singing and dancing, no less!); the set is pretty much vertical. It is also performed in English plus six Indian dialects with no translation needed, because the message of the words still gets across. I have made may icons from pictures I found online. Here they are.

bases )

icons )
icons )
lily_handmaiden: (Default)
icon )

I am back from England! Where I had probably the most amazing time of my life, ever! 

I have been back for about a week, and I have so many things to cover!
*the trip itself
*the awesomeness of the last three Office episodes (sqeeeee!)
*the awesomeness of PotC: AWE (whooooo!)
*the suckiness of my job hunt, which I suppose you can go ahead and read about over here.

Other than that, I have decided on the order of addressing these things: first the trip, in three entries spaced closely together, then The Office, then Pirates-- or possibly both in one entry.

Normally I don't talk about my real life on my lj, but I have a feeling I'm going to wax a bit long for my blog community, so this is where this is going.

lily_handmaiden: (Default)
icon )

An update on my life.

To that I will only add that I did, indeed, survive Winter Term, that I got an A on my second Women in Fiction Paper (I don't know about the big project yet, but still-- woohoo!), and that I don't believe I got the editorial internship, but the company is having me do a phone interview for a different internship in about half an hour, so here's hoping that will go better.

I have also watched the entire series of the British version of "The Office," (hereafter, "The Boffice"), which I will talk about in another entry.

I am going to England in five days! I am incredibly nervous and incredibly excited! It will be for the Shakespeare in England course; we're going to see a play at the Globe and we are going to see Sir Ian McKellan in King Lear. For real! We will be in London for a few days, then Stratford, and then for the free weekend Whitney, Jenaba, and I are going to Bath.

I will, of course, give a full report when I return, but for now let me leave you with this quote. The one in the subject line is from Northanger Abbey.

"'Beware of the insipid Vanities and idle Dissipations of the Metropolis of England; Beware of teh unmeaning Luxuries of Bath and of the stinking fish of Southampton.'
'Alas! (exclaimed I) how am I to avoid those evils I shall never be exposed to? What probability is there of my ever tasting the Dissipations of London, the Luxuries of Bath, or the stinking Fish of Southampton? I who am doomed to waste my Days of Youth and Beauty in an humble Cottage in the Vale of Uske!'
Ah! little did I then think I was ordained so soon to quit that humble Cottage for the Deceitfull Pleasures of the World."
-Jane Austen, Love and Freindship

The icon of today, by the way, quotes Shakespeare's A Winter's Tale, and is my favorite bit of stage direction ever.
lily_handmaiden: (Default)
icon )

Disclaimer: I don't own The Office. It is the property of NBC; I mean no infringement and make no profit. Jane Austen is now public domain.

Here is the conclusion of my elaborate connection of The Office and Persuasion. While I am sure that there are many, many passages about Anne and Wentworth that perfectly reflect Jim and Pam, I decided to go for the big scene toward the end of the novel, chapter 23 to be exact, which contains their reunion. If this happened to Jim and Pam, it would be just... perfect. I was most struck by the explicit parallels in such lines as, "He persisted in having loved none but her. She had never been supplanted. He never even believed himself to see her equal. Thus much, indeed, he was obliged to acknowledge: that he had been constant unconsciously, nay unintentionally; that he had meant to forget her, and believed it to be done. He had imagined himself indifferent, when he had only been angry; and he had been unjust to her merits, because he had been a sufferer from them. Her character was now fixed on his mind as perfection itself, maintaining the loveliest medium of fortitude and gentleness."

Anyway, the basic plot I've made up around this scene is that Michael is having a party at his condo, at least partly to thank some of his staff for working a half day on the weekend (I've decided that's why only some of them are there). The party planning committee, at the top of the scene, is off buying party supplies-- except for Pam, who comes in late, because it snowed. (I wrote this when it was still snowy out... but with the crazy weather we've been having, who knows? This could take place in April. Although, if you do the math I laid out, I think it's March.) I was originally going to have Karen hook up with Toby to coincide with the whole Louisa/ Benwick plot, but decided at the very last minute that it's more likely she'd transfer to corporate at this point, and break up with Jim becuase of that. Let's see, what else... oh, yeah, for the sake of Michael and Dwight's conversation, I had to have Ryan break up with Kelly and take a job at Staples. I don't want to happen, just... for the sake of this thing, it worked. 

Again, I've tried to keep this as close to the original text (starting with the second paragraph) as possible, significantly changing only the dialogue to make it more in character. (Okay, I don't quite think Jim would say, "You pierce my soul," but a) I couldn't think of anything to replace it with, because b) it is so lovely.) Enjoy!


Wow, it just struck me how well the whole "jealousy of Roy" affecting everything he had said and done thing fits right now, after "The Negotiation," and the way Jim acted in that episode. Dude. Also, could Michael's threat to kill himself by pretending to kill himself be our parallel to Louisa jumping off the Cob and breaking her head? No one was hurt, but Jim and Pam did think resourcefully, in synch, and Pam was the first to realize what was about to go down and come up with the present thing. That quick thinking is worthy of Jim's admiration, don't you think?
lily_handmaiden: (Default)
icon )

Disclaimer: The Office is the property of NBC and Universal. I mean no infringement and make no profit. The novels of Jane Austen are public domain.

Think I'm weird if you want. Some time ago, I noticed a distinct parallel between this season of The Office and Jane Austen's Persuasion. Look: Boy and Girl are in love. Although she knows Boy is in love with her, Girl rejects him, thinking it will be the best thing for both of them. Broken-hearted, boy goes far away for a long period of time. Boy comes back. Girl still loves Boy. Boy still loves Girl. Boy still feels angry and rejected and thinks Girl never loved him, so he starts a relationship with Another Girl. Girl thinks that Boy doesn't love her anymore. Neither can voice their true feelings because of all of this misunderstanding and the constraints of their situations. 

The only thing is, it seems unlikely that Karen will fall off something and break her head (spoiler alert!). Still, I couldn't help feeling that the ending of Persuasion presents an ideal solution to Jim and Pam's problems. I decided to see how closely I could adapt some of Persuasion to fit The Office, keeping the narration in the same language and the dialogue to the same gist, and it worked really well. 

For example, look at this description of Anne Elliot: "Anne, with an elegance of mind and sweetness of character, which must have placed her high with any people of real understanding, was nobody with either father or sister; her word had no weight; her convenience was always to give way -- she was only Anne." Now replace "Anne" with "Pam." Replace "father or sister" with "Michael or Dwight." Does not that sum up our Miss Beesly nicely?

Most of what I worked on was the second-to-last chapter, but here are a couple of segments from the introductory chapters. These would take place in the fall, sometime before "The Merger."

The real text can be found here.



This is meant as a sort of prologue to my next entry, which will be my modified version of Chapter 23. It was a bit too much to put all in one entry. The connections get stronger, believe me. Also, I was really, really bored when I did this. Really bored. Don't judge me.
lily_handmaiden: (Default)
Livejournal did something odd, so I'm posting this again. Luckily, I am a genius and saved the whole thing. Still. Grrr.

icon )

First off, an update on recent events from real life. 

Some people have questioned my personal identification with and need to defend various literary heroines. Well, I would now like to defend my defense. Look, this is basically what it is: We identify with fictional characters, in the end, because they contain elements of what we are or what we would wish to be. Or both. You think, "Wow, I wish she was my friend, because she'd really get me." And who is there to say you nay? She might. Elizabeth Bennet is my friend because she is, in many ways, what I want to be. She always knows what to say, and while she isn't the prettiest girl at the ball, she more than makes up for it in other ways. Fanny Price is more what I am, and I am not ashamed to say that. I feel an intense need to defend Fanny because if she is not a heroine, then neither am I. Where does that leave me? She is quiet and shy and timid and cautious. But, when it really matters, she stands up for herself. And that has to mean something. Jane Eyre is a little of each. She is a dreamer like I am, and she is artistic. She is both passionate and shy. She presents both sides of the coin. She cares for herself. She is no bird, and no net ensnares her. I admire her. You see, they are what I am and what I want to be. And that means I have to defend them, because in defending them I'm defending myself. They become present to me through my identification with them, and that means that I feel like, if I understand them while others can't, I have to speak for them. And for people who are like them. For myself.

In that spirit, here is a "Which Jane Austen Heroine/Character Are You Most Like?" Quiz.

I was not much surprised, and often pleased, when these were my top ten:
1. Fanny Price from
Mansfield Park
2. Anne Elliot from Persuasion
3. Elinor Dashwood from Sense and Sensibility
4. Mr. Bingley/ Jane Bennet from Pride and Prejudice
5. Elizabeth Bennet from Pride and Prejudice
6. Jane Fairfax from Emma
7. Marianne Dashwood from Sense and Sensibility
8. Mr. Knightley from Emma
9. Captain Wentworth from Persuasion
10. Catherine Morland from Northanger Abbey

I was not at all surprised that Fanny was my number one, but I was really glad that Anne was second, because I like to think I'm a little more like Anne than Fanny actually. Elinor seemed a little odd, but that I have both Elinor and Marianne both in top ten reflects a nice balance, I think. I was really pleased to have
Elizabeth in my top five. I was a little surprised that Catherine Morland was not higher on the list.

And in speaking of Austen heroes, here is another quiz to figure out which guy from Mansfield Park, Persuasion, or Northanger Abbey you'd be best with. At first I got Edmund "Needs a Slap Upside the Head" Bertram, Lord High Mayor of Wankerville, but after re-evaluating my answers, I ended up with Captain Wentworth. I am more than happy to be paired with Captain Wentworth, the man who writes the most romantic letter ever. "You pierce my soul." Siiigh, swoon.

And finally, here are some icons.

The Office:


Sigh. Please tell me they will at least be friends again sometime soon.

Jane Eyre 2006:

   

   


I know, there's no Toby this time. I'm sorry. I'm slowly making my way through all of the screencaps I have. Also, I have started work on a recap/review of the miniseries.

ITV's upcoming Northanger Abbey:

     
"No one who had ever seen Catherine Morland in her infancy would have supposed her born to be a heroine."
Text from the second one is from the novel.

ITV's upcoming Persuasion:

 

 

   

"She was only Anne" is text from the novel. Lyme Regis is the seaside town they visit. The text for those is inspired by the novel line, "One does not love a place the less for having suffered in it, unless it has been all suffering, nothing but suffering-- which was by no means the case at Lyme." That's from memory, so punctuation at least is probably wrong.


lily_handmaiden: (Default)
icon )


I have some good news and some aggravating news. The Compendium people have heard the aggravating news before, and so has Bethany... but it is possible that my readership extends beyond this, at least to Whitney (look at that; I've mentioned you again!) and Jenaba and ABFG, so I am going to post it here because I CAN. 

But first the good news. Some of you may have heard of a movie hitting the US this summer entitled Becoming Jane. It is supposed to be a biopic about my girl Miss Jane-- Jane Austen, that is. Unfortunately, it has quickly become apparent that the movie is not so much with the accuracy to historical fact and is, in short, a Made-Up Story. This news grieved me to hear. The bad part is that they're marketing it (as they did with King Arthur, and you will remember it bugged me then, too) as The Absolute and Factual Historical Truth Beyond Dispute in All Ways. I am here to tell you now, it is not that. Heed the disclaimer: Becoming Jane is a Made-Up Story. Yes, Jane Austen did briefly know a young man named Tom Lefroy and they were infatuated with each other. But he was a) a respectable young man, unlike in the movie and b) practically engaged to someone else, so Jane's mentor, his aunt (I think?) Mrs. Lefroy c) encouraged him to go away so as not to entangle Jane's feelings which were d) not yet very serious, and they e) more than probably never met again. He could not be fairly called the inspiration for all of her best work; that is silly. He was not anywhere near the love of her life. As plot details have come out, Janeites everywhere have been up in arms, dealing out liberal punishment with the Cluebat of Janeite Righteousness (tm Austenblog). 

Per a reviewer on Austenblog, however, the situation is not so bad as it was generally believed to be. My main problem was the mangling of historical fact which is absolutely known. The rumor was that, for example, they were going to have Jane's sister Cassandra get married. Which she never did. Because her fiancee died of the yellow fever. She and Jane lived their whole lives together; well, Jane's whole life, anyway. However, a person who went to see an early screening said that the first half doesn't have all that much stuff that is Made Up at all! Cassandra does get engaged, but her poor fiancee is dead by the end of the movie. No vows exchanged. I hate to be relieved about Thomas Fowle's dying, but... well, it should be accurately represented. Anything else is unfaithful to his memory and Cassandra's. Of course, the second half of the movie takes some major license, and Jane does a thing or two that she would never, ever have done (whited out for spoiler):  HALF-ATTEMPTED ELOPEMENT WTF!. However, this seems like more the kind of thing you can take dramatic license with. Like, we don't have anything written down saying that Jane did or did not do this thing, and while of course she didn't because all of her characters who do it are irresponsible and stupid, which indicates that she looked down on the practice... the fact that it's in the movie doesn't bother me so much, as long as we all keep in mind that the movie is a Made-Up Story. The other quibbles with the movie have to do with the costumes being from all over the place, time-wise, the dancing being wonky, and the whole thing looking too much like the 2005 version of P&P. These things don't bother me too much. I think it's actually kind of smart of them to play off of the most recent version of Jane Austen's work that their target audience would have seen, and it could even be cool. The period things... meh. I'm not a purist when it comes to movies. I liked the 2005 P&P. I'm a very forgiving audience member, and if I intend to like something I usually do. This report gives me hope that there will be plenty to enjoy in Becoming Jane, and that pleases me. I now want to see it once again. Hooray!

Now for the aggravating (Ally, if you read this... and you remember who it is in reference to [not you, I promise]... um... well, you can beat me up if you want to. I won't be hypocritical. I just feel the need to vent this. I don't expect agreement or even comprehension.):

Something happened in Women in Fiction the other day that really pissed me off. There's this rather cynical girl in my class, who is just way too objective in my opinion. This particular day she began a comment with, "What I don't like about Jane Eyre..." or "What's wrong with Jane Eyre is..." or maybe even, "The reason I don't like Jane Eyre," I can't remember, and something about how she has no follow-through and constantly undermines herself and sabotages her own happiness and sells herself short of living up to her ambitions, or something. Which is kind of crap anyway. I mean, do you have no concept of having to balance a liberal mentality with a conservative time period, GEEZ! Just because Jane's ambitions are not yours does not mean that she is not a fully self-possessed woman who achieves what she wants because she is determined and has a will to do so! And this girl did the same thing with Elizabeth Bennet ("The thing I don't like about Elizabeth, the reason I just don't like her is that she's vain and selfish." PLEASE! There is a difference between selfishness and self-respect!).

 

This same person adores Fevvers, the heroine of Nights at the Circus, which takes place in 1899 but was written in the 1980’s, with 20/20 hindsight and a modern mentality. The worlds can’t even be compared. As I wrote in my notebook, “No. You don’t get to say a word when you like this cartoon of a woman and you insult those who do not have wings.” (Okay, maybe she's not that cartoonish, but literally, Fevvers has wings. Are you incapable of seeing a woman metaphorically fly?) While a modern author can perceive the means of breaking out of social structures, how were Jane Austen and Charlotte Bronte supposed to do the same when they were fighting for the simple privilege of women being considered as rational human beings? They could manipulate and subvert those structures and make them work for them. When Jane and Lizzy get married, it is no different from a woman today deciding to get married. You can’t say that’s wrong. They earn for themselves the option of choice. That is not a cop-out. That is not weakness. Jane Eyre and Elizabeth Bennet are remarkable women. And…

I realize why this bothers me so much. It is because I am the opposite of objective. I always want to be on these characters' sides. To defend them, to the death. Why do I feel this way? Because. For me, this girl saying this was like her attacking one of my friends. It was like her saying, "What I don't like about Marten is..." or "The reason I don't like
Bethany is..."

 

And what's a person's natural response to this kind of attack? You want to beat that person up. To defend your friend, because he or she is your friend and YOU DO NOT TALK ABOUT MY FRIENDS LIKE THAT.

 

Of course, I care about and love my real friends more than Jane and Lizzy, because Jane and Lizzy are fictional. I do realize this. But at the same time, throughout my life, there have been times when it has felt like these fictional heroines-- Jane Eyre, Elizabeth Bennet, Jo March-- were the only ones really there for me; when I was alone and I was upset I could imagine them there, I could imagine what they'd say; if I felt like no one in my real experience could understand what I felt like, there would be someone not real who I felt like could, had she been real. It’s not the same as defending a fandom, like I have done in the past with Star Wars, etc. That’s more like, if you don’t get it, that’s your problem. This is more personal than that.

And that is why there was almost a smackdown in Women in Fiction.

 

In the words of Jane Austen (via Henry Tilney, one of my foremost pretend boyfriends), “The person, be it gentleman or lady, who has not pleasure in a good novel, must be intolerably stupid.” In this spirit, I have introduced a new lj tag, “the intolerably stupid,” to deal specifically with people who piss me off with their literary stupidity.

 

But what makes it more frustrating is that I feel like I let Jane down. I wasn't able to defend her like I should have. For one thing, I felt like there was no opening to talk, and second, I wasn't sure what to say and couldn't trust myself to give the subject the coherence it deserves. Still, if I don't defend these heroines, who will? So I’m venting a bit here. And now I am finished.

 

lily_handmaiden: (Default)
icon )

Jane lies in Winchester-- blessed be her shade!
Praise the Lord for making her, and for all she made!
And while the stones of Winchester, or Milsom Street, remain,
Glory, Love, and Honour unto England's Jane!
-Kipling, "The Janeites"

Today is Jane Austen's 231st birthday. For some time now one of my lj tags has been "jane austen pwns you." I am going to take this opportunity to show you a little bit of why this is so.

Jane pioneered the art of making the everyday extraordinary. She knew people very well, and she wrote them just as they were. That is why her works have lasted so long. You can still recoginze people you know in the form of Lucy Steele, Lady Catherine de Bourgh, Catherine Morland, and so on and so on. She created such wonderful characters. There was a point when I was reading Northanger Abbey that I got so angry and frustrated with John and Isabella Thorpe that I had to put the book down and fume. Because I knew people like that, and they had done things like that to me, and I wanted to whack them upside the head. I have also, many times, laughed out loud reading Jane-- and that's not something that even I do very frequently with "the classics."

It's not very widely known these days, but Jane is actually hilarious. In Rudyard Kipling's story "The Janeites," about a group of soldiers who had formed a secret Jane Austen society, one character says this: "...they'd begin, as often as not, on this Secret Society woman I was tellin' you of-- this Jane. She was the only woman I ever 'eard 'em say a good word for. 'Cordin' to them Jane was a none-such. I didn't know then she was a Society." That quote cracks me up, partly because it puts so plainly what is just perfectly true. You may not believe me when I say Jane Austen is hilarious, because you don't go in for the romantic comedy of manners laced with affectionate satire and snark. So let me show you this.

This is an excerpt from a piece of Jane's Juvenilia. It was written when she was about fifteen, and it's like something a really clever fifteen-year-old would write. It's from a... novella, I guess... called "Love and Freindship," a parody of the romantic novels of the day. It might be useful to point out that fainting and running mad were favorite pasttimes of heroines in these novels. When they disovered their husbands to be dead or unfaithful, the would a) faint instantly, recover only to faint again, repeat as necessary, or b) scream and fall into a hysterical fit, recover briefly, become hysterical again, repeat as necessary. Here a carriage has just been overturned on the road, and the two young ladies who act as heroines realize that the victims of the accident were their long-lost husbands.

"Sophia shreiked and fainted on the ground-- I screamed and instantly ran mad--. We remained thus mutually deprived of our senses, some minutes, and on regaining them were deprived of them again. For an Hour and a Quarter did we continue in this unfortunate situation-- Sophia fainting every moment and I running mad as often. At length a groan from the hapless Edward (who alone retained any share of life) restored us to ourselves. Had we indeed before imagined that either of them lived, we should have been more sparing of our Greif-- but as we had aupposed when we first beheld them that they were no more, we knew that nothing could remain to be done but what we were about. ... I was overjoyed to find him yet sensible. 
'Oh! tell me Edward (said I) tell me I beseech you before you die, what has befallen you since that unhappy Day in which Augustus was arrested and we were separated--'
'I will,' (said he) and instantly fetching a deep sigh, Expired--. Sophia immediately sunk again into a swoon--. My greif was more audible. My Voice faltered, My Eyes assumed a vacant stare, my face became as pale as Death, and my senses were considerably impaired--.
'Talk not to me of Phaetons (said I, raving in a frantic, incoherent manner)-- Give me a violin--. I'll play to him and soothe him in his melancholy Hours-- Beware ye gentle Nymphs of Cupid's Thunderbolts, avoid the piercing shafts of Jupiter-- Look at that grove of Firs-- I see a Leg of Mutton-- They told me Edward was not Dead; but they deceived me-- they took him for a cucumber--' Thus I continued wildly exclaiming on my Edward's Death--. For two Hours did I rave thus madly and should not then have left off, as I was not in the least fatigued, had not Sophia who was just recovered from her swoon, intreated me to consider that Night was no approaching and that the Damps began to fall."

Is that not wonderfully goofy stuff? And it is awesome because I wrote things like that (maybe not that clever) when I was fifteen! I write things like that now! If I do things like this, how very easy it is to imagine teenaged Jane trying to repress laughter while reading this out loud in a highly dramatic manner to her sister!

Here is another bit of Juvenilia from the brilliant "History of England, by a Partial, Prejudiced, and Ignorant Historian," which reminds me of a mix of Monty Python and Dave Barry Slept Here, A Sort-Of History of the United States. In this work, Jane's overall goal is to try to make Mary Queen of Scots out to be a martyr at the hands of her cruel and inhumane cousin Elizabeth. This is from the section on Henry VIII, "whose only merit was his not being quite so bad as his daughter Elizabeth."

"The Crimes and Cruelties of this Prince, were too numerous to be mentioned, (as this history I trust has fully shown;) and nothing can be said in his vindication, but that his abolishing Religious Houses and leaving them to the ruinous depredations of time has been of infinite use to the landscape of England in general, which probably was a principal motive for his doing it, since otherwise why should a Man who was of no Religion himself be at so much trouble to abolish one which had for ages been established in the Kingdom. His Majesty's 5th Wife was the Duke of Norfolk's Neice who, tho' universally acquitted of the crimes for which she was beheaded, has been by many people supposed to have led an abandoned life before her Marriage-- of this however I have many doubts, since she was a relation of that noble Duke of Norfolk who was so warm in the Queen of Scotland's cause, and who at last fell victim to it. The Kings last wife contrived to survive him, but with difficulty effected it."

When I first decided to do this post, I had just finished Persuasion, Jane's last novel. I read it shortly after I read the Juvenilia, actually, and how much she had matured during her life, the sort of bittersweetness of Persuasion-- especially if the story if the Great Unknown, the man who met Jane Austen (at Lyme, I believe) and would have married her but died before he could, is true-- is so stirring. Here are some excerpts of what I'm talking about.

"Half the sum of attraction,  on either side, might have been enough, for he had nothing to do, and she had hardly anybody to love."

"She left it all behind her; all but the recollection that such things had been."

"One does not love a place the less for having suffered in it, unless it has been all suffering, nothing but suffering-- which was by no means the case at Lyme."

"No, I believe you capable of everything great and good in your married lives. I believe you equal to every important exertion, and to every domestic forbearance, so long as-- if I may be allowed the expression, so long as you have an object. I mean, while the woman you love lives, and lives for you. All the privilege I claim for my own sex (it is not a very enviable one, you need not covet it) is that of loving longest, when existence or when hope is gone."

Mixed with the humor of such lines as:

"One likes to hear what is going on, to be au fait as to the newest modes of being trifling and silly."

And the romance of:

"You pierce my soul. I am half agony, half hope. Tel me not that I am too late, that such precious feelings are gone for ever. I offer myself to you again with a heart even more your own, than when you almost broke it eight years and a half ago. Dare not say that man forgets sooner than woman, that his love has an earlier death. I have loved none but you."

Let me state the obvious for a moment: What a range.

She's such a fascinating woman. And because of the way she writes, on such a personal level, forming a relationship with the reader, we all think of her as our friend. Our friend Jane. This is why her fans are called Janeites, not Austenites, usually. We feel like we know her-- which, of course, we don't. No one living today will ever completely know the whole truth of who Jane Austen was as a person. But we all know a little bit, the little bit that we connect to so intimately through her writing.

Let me quote Kipling once more: "There's no one to touch Jane when you're in a tight place. Gawd bless 'er, whoever she was."

Yes. God bless her, whoever she was.

Happy Birthday, Jane!

  

Profile

lily_handmaiden: (Default)
lily_handmaiden

December 2011

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021 2223 24
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 16th, 2025 06:00 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios